IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpubp/v12y2016i3-4-5-6p149-167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conducting procedures in administrative matters in reasonable time - analysis of selected case law by the European Court of Human Rights versus Slovenia

Author

Listed:
  • Tina Sever

Abstract

According to the Public Administration Development Strategy 2015-2020 Slovenia is facing the challenge of much-needed modernisation of administrative procedure regulation in order to conduct procedures more efficiently and in reasonable time as well as to become more customer oriented and to adjust its administrative system to the needs of modern society. With this in mind, the paper analyses case law of the European Court of Human Rights referring to the Republic of Slovenia in relation to the application of Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights for Administrative Matters. The paper identifies problems in current regulation by using normative analysis. Finally, on the basis of obtained results, suggestions for the modernisation of administrative procedural law are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Tina Sever, 2016. "Conducting procedures in administrative matters in reasonable time - analysis of selected case law by the European Court of Human Rights versus Slovenia," International Journal of Public Policy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(3/4/5/6), pages 149-167.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:12:y:2016:i:3/4/5/6:p:149-167
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=79764
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tina Sever, 2018. "Procedural Safeguards under the European Convention on Human Rights in Public (Administrative) Law Matters," DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, European Association Comenius - EACO, issue 2, pages 97-116, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:12:y:2016:i:3/4/5/6:p:149-167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=97 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.