IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpqma/v1y2006i4p411-424.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Average outgoing quality limit and lot tolerance percent defective indexed acceptance sampling plans using artificial neural networks

Author

Listed:
  • D. Vasudevan
  • V. Selladurai

Abstract

For maintaining quality at a target Average Outgoing Quality Limit (AOQL) and not below some quality value such as Lot Tolerance Percent Defective (LTPD) if we use the Dodge–Romig table, it offers limited flexibility to quality control engineers in designing sampling plans to meet these specific needs. To overcome this disadvantage, closed-form solutions to determine the AOQL- and LTPD-indexed single sampling plans using Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) are proposed. To determine the closed-form solutions, feed-forward neural networks with sigmoid neural function are trained by back propagation algorithm. From the weight and bias values of these trained ANNs, the closed-form solutions to determine the sampling plans are obtained. Numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the proposed method. The proposed method does not involve table look-ups or complex calculations. Sampling plan can be determined by using this method, for any required AOQL, LTPD, lot size and process average. Suggestions are provided to duplicate this idea for applying to other standard sampling table schemes.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Vasudevan & V. Selladurai, 2006. "Average outgoing quality limit and lot tolerance percent defective indexed acceptance sampling plans using artificial neural networks," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 411-424.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:1:y:2006:i:4:p:411-424
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=9095
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:1:y:2006:i:4:p:411-424. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=177 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.