IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpmbe/v7y2017i2p183-205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic literature review of classification and categorisation of benchmarking in supply chain management

Author

Listed:
  • Kailash
  • Rajeev Kumar Saha
  • Sanjeev Goyal

Abstract

In this competitive environment every organisation wants to achieve top most position in their area. Benchmarking is a very versatile tool that can be applied in a variety of ways to meet a range of requirements for improvement. A large number of publications by researchers reflect the interest in this technique. In this paper, author has reviewed literatures available on this topic, benchmarking of internal supply chain management related to various fields of supply chain management since year 1980s, implementation of supply chain management through reputed journals and arrangement of literature in chronological order. The authors have classified the publications of benchmarking as well as the functional areas of specialisation in categories through table, figure and graphical representation. Each category covers a number of publications in which all the major related aspects of the problem are discussed. This paper is very useful for researchers to check maximum work done up to now in different fields like: finance, sales, service, logistic supply chain management, research and development, marketing and purchase, IT and communication, manufacturing, education sector, hotels, food and processing industries etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Kailash & Rajeev Kumar Saha & Sanjeev Goyal, 2017. "Systematic literature review of classification and categorisation of benchmarking in supply chain management," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 183-205.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:183-205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=83105
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpmbe:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:183-205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=95 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.