IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpman/v2y2009i1p79-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The threat-based influence strategy and monitoring arrangements in voluntary retail chains: the conflict and control effects

Author

Listed:
  • Aksel I. Rokkan
  • Arnt Buvik

Abstract

A Threat-based Influence Strategy (TIS) means that the principal communicates to the agent that negative sanctions will be carried out if the agent fails to perform a desired action. This type of influence is often associated with a high conflict potential. This article presents an empirical study that focuses on the effectiveness of using TIS, given the different levels of monitoring in voluntary retail chains. Specifically, the research explores two complementary scenarios about the effect of TIS on free-riding behaviour: the conflict scenario and the control scenario. If the level of monitoring is low to modest, the TIS lacks credibility and the principal is unable to discriminate between the free riders and the conformers. Hence, the TIS undermines cooperation and increases the level of free riding within the system. When TISs are combined with substantial monitoring, we expect this governance pattern to change significantly. Comprehensive monitoring increases the incentive for compliance in order to avoid punishment, makes the chain's obligations and performance standards clearer and, hence, easier to follow and improves the precision with which the principal can discriminate between the agents that conform to or deviate from their obligations. An empirical study of 79 voluntary retail chains provides support to the proposed hypotheses.

Suggested Citation

  • Aksel I. Rokkan & Arnt Buvik, 2009. "The threat-based influence strategy and monitoring arrangements in voluntary retail chains: the conflict and control effects," International Journal of Procurement Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1), pages 79-92.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:2:y:2009:i:1:p:79-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=21731
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:2:y:2009:i:1:p:79-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=255 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.