IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpdev/v25y2021i3p283-302.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A lean framework for reusing knowledge: introducing engineering checksheets

Author

Listed:
  • Dag Bergsjö
  • Amer Catic
  • Daniel Stenholm

Abstract

In this study, we have brought several knowledge management theories and practices together and have investigated the valuable aspects in each one of them. Throughout our research, we have enabled knowledge reuse to be a guiding principle and have attempted to formulate an improved method for documenting knowledge. The focus has been to create actionable and reusable knowledge presented at the right time, to the right audience in a digitally condensed format that may hopefully will lead to improved decision making, thereby potentially driving innovation and effectively reducing overall product realisation lead-time. We have explored the effect of the engineering checksheet concept in two separate case studies where it was implemented in a real-life setting. The concept showed positive results as a knowledge carrier both for reuse by experienced and novice users.

Suggested Citation

  • Dag Bergsjö & Amer Catic & Daniel Stenholm, 2021. "A lean framework for reusing knowledge: introducing engineering checksheets," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(3), pages 283-302.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpdev:v:25:y:2021:i:3:p:283-302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=118010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpdev:v:25:y:2021:i:3:p:283-302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=36 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.