IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijpdev/v19y2014i4p214-230.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The cost of customising: assessing the performance of a modular product programme

Author

Listed:
  • Jeppe Bjerrum Ulrikkeholm
  • Lars Hvam

Abstract

Introducing modularity in product development as a mean for dealing with increasing levels of variance within product portfolios has been widely and successfully applied by many companies. It is however important to acknowledge that challenges related to product portfolio variance will not disappear after introducing modularity. A new type of variance on modular level is likely to develop over time. Empirical work carried out in a large international engineering company designing customer specific products confirms that increasing levels of variance within module portfolios can lead to reduced performance according to crucial key performance indicators. The findings illustrate the importance of recognising the potential trade-off when continually complying with unique customer requests. The paper contributes with a detailed insight into a company's competitive performance trade-off on a modular level after introducing mass customisation. The paper also adds a dimension to existing survey-based findings on the potential trade-offs.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeppe Bjerrum Ulrikkeholm & Lars Hvam, 2014. "The cost of customising: assessing the performance of a modular product programme," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(4), pages 214-230.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpdev:v:19:y:2014:i:4:p:214-230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=63002
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijpdev:v:19:y:2014:i:4:p:214-230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=36 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.