IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v49y2024i3p358-384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credit rating ranking of Iranian banks based on CAMELS and hybrid multi-criteria decision analysis methods in uncertain environments

Author

Listed:
  • Amir Karbassi Yazdi
  • Precious Okereke
  • Peter Fernandes Wanke
  • Seyed Arash Shahr Aeini
  • Amir Mehdiabadi

Abstract

This research aims to rank Iranian banks by CAMELS and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods in uncertain environments. Ranking banks can lead to a better understanding of how customers select them and use their services. Since there is close competition between private and government banks in Iran, the most popular rating system (CAMELS) can help customers gain a better understanding of their situation. The CAMELS method consists of a rating based on bank performance factors. For finding the best bank in Iran once the CAMELS factors are considered, banks are then ranked by the COmbined COmpromise SOlution (CoCoSo) method, which also requires the stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) method to be used. The environment, however, is changing, thus affecting decision makers (DMs), so using uncertainty methods such as Pythagorean fuzzy numbers (PFN) is essential, which helps DMs make better decisions. The sample population of this research is eight public banks in Iran. The result indicates the best bank based on CAMELS and MCDA methods in uncertain environments with the result also pointing out how banks with a lower performance can do benchmarking to improve their performances according to CAMELS factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Amir Karbassi Yazdi & Precious Okereke & Peter Fernandes Wanke & Seyed Arash Shahr Aeini & Amir Mehdiabadi, 2024. "Credit rating ranking of Iranian banks based on CAMELS and hybrid multi-criteria decision analysis methods in uncertain environments," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 49(3), pages 358-384.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:49:y:2024:i:3:p:358-384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=137132
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:49:y:2024:i:3:p:358-384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.