IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v48y2023i3p316-337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using constructivist multi-criteria decision aid to evaluate the workforce sizing in public organisations: the case of a Brazilian university

Author

Listed:
  • Juliana Fausto Flores
  • André Andrade Longaray
  • Leonardo Ensslin
  • Ademar Dutra
  • Sandra Ensslin
  • Vilmar Antonio Gonçalves Tondolo

Abstract

When addressing staff sizing management, the workforce that is required to meet the institution's objectives must be quantitatively and qualitatively identified and analysed, taking the institution's environment into account. Most studies concerning workforce sizing in learning institutions are limited to measuring faculty performance. Therefore, a gap in the literature exists concerning a performance evaluation of the sizing procedures for the administrative workforce at universities. We developed a model to determine the requirements for a workforce sizing at a Brazilian public university. The research was classified as applied, exploratory, and descriptive, and it was divided into qualitative and quantitative steps. Utilising a constructivist multi-criteria decision aid approach, 83 primary evaluation elements and 119 descriptors were identified. The status quo analysis revealed three areas with performance levels significantly lower and 50 indicators that are at a compromising level, for which action plans were proposed. The built model supported the manager in the performance evaluation of the staff sizing procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Juliana Fausto Flores & André Andrade Longaray & Leonardo Ensslin & Ademar Dutra & Sandra Ensslin & Vilmar Antonio Gonçalves Tondolo, 2023. "Using constructivist multi-criteria decision aid to evaluate the workforce sizing in public organisations: the case of a Brazilian university," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 48(3), pages 316-337.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:48:y:2023:i:3:p:316-337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=134779
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:48:y:2023:i:3:p:316-337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.