IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v45y2022i1p86-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Jackknifing then model averaging: investigating the improvements to fitness to data and prediction accuracy of two-input under-fitted and just-fitted response models

Author

Listed:
  • Domingo Pavolo
  • Delson Chikobvu

Abstract

The possibility of improving the fitness to data and prediction accuracy of models in a multi-response surface methodology environment of under and just-fitted ordinary least squares response models by jackknifing then combining the resultant partial estimates and the pseudo-values using arithmetic averaging or criterion-based frequentist model averaging was investigated. Jackknifing is known to reduce parametric and model bias. Model averaging is known to reduce model bidirectional bias and variance. A typical multi-response surface methodology dataset and resultant validation dataset were used as example. Results suggest that it is possible to obtain better fitness to data and prediction accuracy by jackknifing a just-fitted response model of interest and combining the resultant partial estimates using arithmetic averaging. The combining of pseudo-values using arithmetic averaging or criterion-based frequentist model averaging gave mixed results. The actual jackknife model estimators gave good performance with under-fitted models.

Suggested Citation

  • Domingo Pavolo & Delson Chikobvu, 2022. "Jackknifing then model averaging: investigating the improvements to fitness to data and prediction accuracy of two-input under-fitted and just-fitted response models," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 45(1), pages 86-106.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:45:y:2022:i:1:p:86-106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=125720
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:45:y:2022:i:1:p:86-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.