IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijores/v32y2018i3p380-396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Waiting time distribution for an exchangeable item repair system with two failed components

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Dreyfuss
  • Alan Stulman

Abstract

Models involving exchangeable component repair systems are widely treated in the literature. In such systems, a customer arrives at a repair queue with a failed component which is replaced from stocks of previously repaired components. Various strategies and service measures have been discussed. Customers who arrive with a single failed component type will be referred to the appropriate service queue which will exchange the failed component. The waiting time distribution for a single failed component has also been developed. The development of the waiting time distribution for a single queue servicing multiple component failures has been neglected. There are many instances where two distinct components are linked so that one failure will cause the failure of the second. Finding the waiting time distribution for the customer is important because it can lead to better facility planning and realistic service measures. For example, how many extra spares should be in the system so as to limit the probability of waiting more than an acceptable amount of time (the window fill rate). We limit our development to the case of two failed components; however, the ideas developed may be extendable to more than just two failed component.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Dreyfuss & Alan Stulman, 2018. "Waiting time distribution for an exchangeable item repair system with two failed components," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 32(3), pages 380-396.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:32:y:2018:i:3:p:380-396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=92741
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijores:v:32:y:2018:i:3:p:380-396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=170 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.