IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijnvor/v17y2017i4p371-391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To sit or to stand, that is the question: examining the effects of work posture change on the well-being at work of software professionals

Author

Listed:
  • Markus Makkonen
  • Minna Silvennoinen
  • Tuula Nousiainen
  • Arto J. Pesola
  • Mikko Vesisenaho

Abstract

Despite the central role of human resources in determining the success of software companies, relatively little academic research has been conducted on the well-being at work aspect of software professionals. This study aims to address the aforementioned gap by examining the effects of using standing instead of sitting workstations on the well-being at work of software professionals in terms of their physical activity, mental alertness, stress, and musculoskeletal strain. An intervention study consisting of two measurements was conducted for 29 employees of a large Finnish software company by using questionnaires and the Firstbeat Lifestyle Assessment service. The findings of the study suggest that the usage of standing instead of sitting workstations results in only modest promotions of physical activity, does not have an effect on mental alertness, actually tilts the stress-recovery balance towards stress, but decreases musculoskeletal strain in the neck and shoulders, although increasing it in the legs and feet.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus Makkonen & Minna Silvennoinen & Tuula Nousiainen & Arto J. Pesola & Mikko Vesisenaho, 2017. "To sit or to stand, that is the question: examining the effects of work posture change on the well-being at work of software professionals," International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(4), pages 371-391.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijnvor:v:17:y:2017:i:4:p:371-391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=88504
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijnvor:v:17:y:2017:i:4:p:371-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=22 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.