IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmtma/v6y2004i1-2p137-154.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The multi-source fabless-foundry partnership selection model

Author

Listed:
  • Jia-Jane Shuai
  • Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng
  • Han-Lin Li

Abstract

Foundry selection is an important decision to a semiconductor fabless (FABricationLESS) design firm. This partnership is a long-term commitment and the success of a fabless is directly affected by the decision. This paper presents a multiple criteria evaluation model for international multiple foundry partnership selection. In a multiple source foundry environment, the fabless maintains partnership with several different foundries to diversify the risk of capacity shortage and natural disaster. We outline the potential planning problems for foundry partnership selection and analyse issues related to cost, yield and time to market. A hierarchical multiple criteria decision-making method for selecting the foundry partners is proposed. Based on a hierarchical structure, non-additive and additive fuzzy measurement is used to show the relative importance of criteria. To select a group of foundry partners, management culture, technology level and future growth are heavily interrelated, the fuzzy integral is, therefore, used to evaluate the synthetic performance of the best partners. To show the practicability and usefulness of this method, a Taiwan consumer integrated circuit (IC) fabless case was presented for evaluation. Results in this study not only confirm the practical nature of the proposed model, but also demonstrate the high flexibility in evaluation of a multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Jia-Jane Shuai & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Han-Lin Li, 2004. "The multi-source fabless-foundry partnership selection model," International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(1/2), pages 137-154.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmtma:v:6:y:2004:i:1/2:p:137-154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=4512
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmtma:v:6:y:2004:i:1/2:p:137-154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=21 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.