IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmpra/v2y2006i2p127-143.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enterprise Systems contracting: developing and testing a model of divergent approaches in the service and manufacturing sectors

Author

Listed:
  • Ned Kock
  • Jacques Verville

Abstract

Virtually all Enterprise Systems (ES) implementation projects start with a purchase contract. Yet there has been little research on ES contracting approaches, and how those approaches relate to the previous literature on productivity gains from spending on those systems. Building on the IT productivity paradox notion, this paper proposes a model of divergent ES contracting approaches in the service and manufacturing sectors. Two main ES contracting approaches are defined – the revisionist-adversarial approach, associated with ES contracting elements geared at potentially short-term and change-oriented relationships with ES vendors; and the preservationist-cooperative approach, associated with ES contracting elements aimed at mutual cooperation over the long run with ES vendors. It is proposed that service sector organisations generally display a preference toward the revisionist-adversarial approach, whereas manufacturing sector organisations generally display a preference toward a preservationist-cooperative approach. These propositions, which are aligned with the IT productivity paradox phenomenon, are supported by a survey of 116 organisations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ned Kock & Jacques Verville, 2006. "Enterprise Systems contracting: developing and testing a model of divergent approaches in the service and manufacturing sectors," International Journal of Management Practice, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 127-143.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:2:y:2006:i:2:p:127-143
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=10151
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:2:y:2006:i:2:p:127-143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=91 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.