IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmpra/v1y2005i2p109-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical investigation of faculty research productivity and implications for practice

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa A. Burke
  • Karen E. James

Abstract

The research productivity of management faculty is examined with a web-based survey and random sample of 236 faculty from a wide range of AACSB-accredited schools. Various hypotheses are tested to assess the influence of "person" variables (i.e., Big Five personality, individual research values, time management skills, career position) and situational variables (i.e., time availability, primary teaching audience, and institutional support) on research productivity. Based on the results, practical implications for selecting and developing university faculty as researchers and teachers are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa A. Burke & Karen E. James, 2005. "An empirical investigation of faculty research productivity and implications for practice," International Journal of Management Practice, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(2), pages 109-130.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:1:y:2005:i:2:p:109-130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=7131
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yin, Zhifeng & Liang, Zheng & Zhi, Qiang, 2018. "Does the concentration of scientific research funding in institutions promote knowledge output?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 1146-1159.
    2. Zhifeng Yin & Qiang Zhi, 2017. "Dancing with the academic elite: a promotion or hindrance of research production?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(1), pages 17-41, January.
    3. Paulo Lopes Henriques & Carla Curado & Mírian Oliveira & Antônio Carlos Gastaud Maçada, 2019. "Publishing? You can count on knowledge, experience, and expectations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1301-1324, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:1:y:2005:i:2:p:109-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=91 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.