IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmpra/v17y2024i2p129-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Needs theories and contemporary research: can unmet needs contribute to victimisation in the workplace?

Author

Listed:
  • Jillian Williamson Yarbrough
  • Leslie Ramos Salazar

Abstract

The following paper seeks to uncover potential support for workplace victimisation through an examination of employees' needs and needs-based motivation theories. An inductive thematic analysis was utilised to explore a sample of 721 web-based comments relating to workplace harassment and conflict. The researchers conclude that if underlying workplace needs can be identified, victims of workplace harassment can be empowered through the development and attainment of unmet needs. The study calls for further research, and consideration of, a managerial shift in practice regarding workplace harassment. Specifically, based on the study's conclusions, managers should contemplate a proactive development approach to employees' needs by seeking to empower victims of workplace mistreatment.

Suggested Citation

  • Jillian Williamson Yarbrough & Leslie Ramos Salazar, 2024. "Needs theories and contemporary research: can unmet needs contribute to victimisation in the workplace?," International Journal of Management Practice, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(2), pages 129-149.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:129-149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=136985
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:129-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=91 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.