IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmpra/v16y2023i5p561-584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-conservation evaluation framework for built heritage conservation within UNESCO world heritage sites: adaptive reuse museums in George Town, Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Firzan
  • Nila Keumala

Abstract

Evaluation is a management tool that is passively explored in the realm of built heritage conservation. With the aim to develop a post-conservation evaluation (PCE) framework for built heritage, this study sequentially attempts to form a conceptual PCE framework (based on theoretical relevance) and to validate the conceptual PCE framework (for practical relevance). Review on pertinent literature was performed to form the framework constructs. Delphi method involving conservation stakeholders and experts was then employed to perform content and face validity tests on the conceptual PCE framework. Three criteria (physical appropriateness, functional effectiveness, and financial efficiency) with their respective evaluation contexts (indicators, parameters, and judgement basis) were found to be highly relevant as the constructs of PCE framework, yielding excellent scores in both content and face validity tests. This study contributes to the establishment of a PCE framework for the context of adaptive reuse museums within UNESCO World Heritage Site.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Firzan & Nila Keumala, 2023. "Post-conservation evaluation framework for built heritage conservation within UNESCO world heritage sites: adaptive reuse museums in George Town, Malaysia," International Journal of Management Practice, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(5), pages 561-584.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:561-584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=133111
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:16:y:2023:i:5:p:561-584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=91 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.