IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmpra/v13y2020i5p521-546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do the managers of boutique hotels value their tangible and intangible attributes in the same way as their guests?

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Fuentes-Moraleda
  • Teresa Villacé-Molinero
  • Carmen Lafuente-Ibáñez
  • Ana Muñoz-Mazón

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to identify tangible and intangible attributes of boutique hotels and how they are rated by the guests and the managers, to analyse whether or not there are differences and whether these differences are based on variables such as age, level of income and gender. Results confirm that guests consider the comfort of the services provided by the hotel and the sense of feeling good (lack of noise, comfort) and connected (Wi-Fi) to be the most important, whereas for managers, the important attributes are related to the room (bed, décor). The client age, level of income and gender are not determining variables in the differences between guest and manager ratings. Managerial implications emphasise the importance of emotional experiences and the use of social media to reduce the gap between managers and guests.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Fuentes-Moraleda & Teresa Villacé-Molinero & Carmen Lafuente-Ibáñez & Ana Muñoz-Mazón, 2020. "Do the managers of boutique hotels value their tangible and intangible attributes in the same way as their guests?," International Journal of Management Practice, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(5), pages 521-546.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:13:y:2020:i:5:p:521-546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=110005
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:13:y:2020:i:5:p:521-546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=91 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.