IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmpra/v13y2020i3p295-320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A multidimensional indicator system for quantifying business process interface problems

Author

Listed:
  • Matthias Lederer
  • Laura Heider
  • Jannis Maier

Abstract

Process orientation within companies is widely acknowledged to deal with modern business challenges. However, business processes usually run across many departments, creating organisational interfaces. Such interfaces often produce errors and thus weaken the line and workflow organisation of companies. This article first develops a list of factors that typically drive interface criticality (e.g., lack of common language of departments, absence of shared reward systems). In addition, to assess the criticality of an interface in business practice, this paper presents an evaluated assessment model. It helps process and team managers to measure or even predict the criticality of organisational interfaces using standard metrics. An IT prototype is given in the paper, which makes the application of the assessment feasible.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthias Lederer & Laura Heider & Jannis Maier, 2020. "A multidimensional indicator system for quantifying business process interface problems," International Journal of Management Practice, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(3), pages 295-320.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:13:y:2020:i:3:p:295-320
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=106939
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:13:y:2020:i:3:p:295-320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=91 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.