IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmefi/v11y2018i4p363-383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Price efficiency on Islamic banks vs. conventional banks in Bahrain, UAE, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and Saudi Arabia: impact of country governance

Author

Listed:
  • Fakarudin Kamarudin
  • Fadzlan Sufian
  • Annuar Md. Nassir
  • Nazratul Aina Mohamad Anwar
  • Nur Ainna Ramli
  • Khar Mang Tan
  • Hafezali Iqbal Hussain

Abstract

This research investigate the impact of six dimensions of country governance to the price efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks. The empirical analysis is focused on the Islamic and conventional banks operating in the Bahrain, UAE, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and Saudi Arabia countries. The data envelopment analysis (DEA) method applied to compute the revenue efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks. Then used the Multivariate Panel Regression Analysis with the Ordinary Least Square as an estimation method to investigate the potential determinants and the effect of country governance on the revenue efficiency. The empirical findings indicate that greater voice and accountability, political stability, regulatory quality, rule of law and control of corruption enhance the revenue efficiency of both Islamic and conventional banks. The dimension of government effectiveness exerts positive sign relationship with the banks revenue efficiency only on conventional banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Fakarudin Kamarudin & Fadzlan Sufian & Annuar Md. Nassir & Nazratul Aina Mohamad Anwar & Nur Ainna Ramli & Khar Mang Tan & Hafezali Iqbal Hussain, 2018. "Price efficiency on Islamic banks vs. conventional banks in Bahrain, UAE, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar and Saudi Arabia: impact of country governance," International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(4), pages 363-383.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmefi:v:11:y:2018:i:4:p:363-383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=95743
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmefi:v:11:y:2018:i:4:p:363-383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=218 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.