IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmede/v17y2018i1p21-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contesting the underperformance thesis of women entrepreneurs: firm-level evidence from South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Colin C. Williams
  • Abbi Kedir

Abstract

This paper provides one of the first known evaluations of whether enterprises in which women are owners underperform male-owned enterprises in the developing world. Until now, the widespread assumption, mostly from developed world studies, has been that enterprises in which women are owners underperform male-owned enterprises. To evaluate this in developing countries where there is a dearth of studies, cross-sectional data are reported from a 2007 World Bank enterprise survey of 937 South African enterprises. The finding is that enterprises that are women-owned or jointly owned by men and women perform better than those owned solely by men, after controlling for other determinants of firm performance as well as potential sample selection bias. The outcome is a call to transcend the underperformance thesis regarding women entrepreneurs and for greater resources to be devoted to the promotion of women's entrepreneurship and women's involvement in firm ownership.

Suggested Citation

  • Colin C. Williams & Abbi Kedir, 2018. "Contesting the underperformance thesis of women entrepreneurs: firm-level evidence from South Africa," International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(1), pages 21-35.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmede:v:17:y:2018:i:1:p:21-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=88327
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmede:v:17:y:2018:i:1:p:21-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=89 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.