IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmdma/v7y2006i2-3p328-336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Axiomatic analysis of auction rules

Author

Listed:
  • Somdeb Lahiri

Abstract

An auction is an example of a resource allocation rule. The auction procedure operates by each player being required to submit a sealed bid for the object. We assume, for convenience, that all bids are positive and that no two bids are equal. The problem of determining the buyer to whom the object has to be assigned on the basis of the bidding profile, leads to an allocation rule. Our initial result concerns axiomatically characterising all allocation rules, which assigns the object to the bidder whose bid has a pre-specified rank among all the bids that the seller receives. We call such allocation rules, rank based allocation rules. We use two properties to characterise such allocation rules: the allocation rule should be order preserving; it should be anonymous. Once we introduce a pricing rule along with an allocation rule, we have a well-defined auction rule. We axiomatically characterise auction rules, which allocates the object to the highest bidder. We invoke the assumptions of competitiveness and non-responsiveness to characterise the Vickrey auction rule and its generalisation respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Somdeb Lahiri, 2006. "Axiomatic analysis of auction rules," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2/3), pages 328-336.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:7:y:2006:i:2/3:p:328-336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=9152
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:7:y:2006:i:2/3:p:328-336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=19 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.