IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmdma/v23y2024i1p1-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A decision-support framework for evaluating supplier performance in the trial production stage of new car model development: a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach

Author

Listed:
  • Detcharat Sumrit
  • Kamphon Pingsusaen

Abstract

This study proposes a decision support framework using a hybrid multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach for evaluating supplier performance in the trial production stage of new car model development. First, 18 evaluation criteria are identified through rigorous literature review and confirmed by two groups of industrial experts. Second, consistent fuzzy preference relations (CFPRs) and fuzzy-based criteria importance through inter-criteria correlation (fuzzy CRITIC) are integrated to determine the subjective weights and objective weights of evaluation criteria. Next, a fuzzy-based Vlse Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (fuzzy VIKOR) approach is employed to rank the performance of suppliers. Thereafter, the sensitivity analysis is conducted to verify the stability and robustness of the proposed decision-making framework. Finally, the comparative study with other MCDM approaches. One of the largest Japanese car manufacturing in Thailand is used as a case study to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Detcharat Sumrit & Kamphon Pingsusaen, 2024. "A decision-support framework for evaluating supplier performance in the trial production stage of new car model development: a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 23(1), pages 1-32.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:23:y:2024:i:1:p:1-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=135282
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:23:y:2024:i:1:p:1-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=19 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.