IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmdma/v22y2023i4p434-471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of barriers to electric vehicles adoption: an integrated Pareto cum FUCOM approach

Author

Listed:
  • Shantanu Saraswat
  • Ahmad Abdullah
  • Faisal Talib

Abstract

In today's world of exhausting non-renewable fossil fuels and ever-growing pollution on a global scale, there is an urgent need to focus on overcoming the climate changes caused by pollution. The auto industry being a major contributor to air pollution, came up with an alternative, electric vehicles. The objective of this paper is to identify, categorise and prioritise the barriers to the adoption of electric vehicles on a mass scale and to propose an implication model for industries. This study identifies 53 barriers through an extensive literature review and expert opinions and classifies them into four main categories. The significance of various subcategory barriers is evaluated using Pareto analysis. The ranking is done according to weights, which are determined by a novel full consistency method (FUCOM) approach. The result of this study reveals that out of 53 barriers, the vital few came out to be 24 barriers. Further among the four main category barriers, the economic barrier (EB) and knowledge management barrier (KMB) are found to be the most and the least influential main category barriers, respectively. The findings of this study will be beneficial to industrial managers and top-level management of the electric vehicles (EVs) auto industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Shantanu Saraswat & Ahmad Abdullah & Faisal Talib, 2023. "Analysis of barriers to electric vehicles adoption: an integrated Pareto cum FUCOM approach," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(4), pages 434-471.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:22:y:2023:i:4:p:434-471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=134053
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:22:y:2023:i:4:p:434-471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=19 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.