IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmdma/v21y2022i2p195-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The dialectic of failure or hope in organisations: a grounded theory study in a developing country context

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Hakkak
  • Mohammad Hossein Azadi
  • Khaled Nawaser
  • Haniruzila Hanifah
  • Ali Vafaei-Zadeh

Abstract

This study aims to investigate a grounded theory (GT) concerned with the dialectic of failure/hope in an organisation based on the principal strategy of the GT approach. The results were formulated in a series of propositions and the model of causal relationships was drawn through the analysis of in-depth interviews with a total number of 17 employees working for a state-owned enterprise. According to the results, the toxic organisational structure was identified as casual conditions with three categories of negative individual behaviours, negative interpersonal behaviours, and bad management behaviours. Additionally, the dialectic of failure/hope was assessed as a core phenomenon. Moreover, the characteristics of a peacemaking leader including coalition and co-thinking, action-orientation, and initiative were brought to light. Ultimately, the outcomes were explored at three levels of increasing personal commitment, improving interpersonal communication skills, and boosting organisational performance and then five propositions of the research model were extracted.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Hakkak & Mohammad Hossein Azadi & Khaled Nawaser & Haniruzila Hanifah & Ali Vafaei-Zadeh, 2022. "The dialectic of failure or hope in organisations: a grounded theory study in a developing country context," International Journal of Management and Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(2), pages 195-221.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:21:y:2022:i:2:p:195-221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=121927
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zahra Ghasemi Kooktapeh & Hakimeh Dustmohammadloo & Hooman Mehrdoost & Farivar Fatehi, 2023. "In the Line of Fire: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Job Burnout Among Nurses," Papers 2312.14853, arXiv.org.
    2. Mehrnaz Kouhihabibi & Erfan Mohammadi, 2023. "The Future of Sustainability in Germany: Areas for Improvement and Innovation," Papers 2311.08678, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmdma:v:21:y:2022:i:2:p:195-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=19 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.