IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcph/v12y2019i2p133-149.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the effect of organisational practices on work effectiveness of employees

Author

Listed:
  • Ajinkya S. Joshi
  • Vinayak S. Deshpande
  • Padmakar J. Pawar

Abstract

This is a case study to identify most significant organisational practices determining the work effectiveness of the employees of a government undertaking, Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) India. Four key elements influencing the work effectiveness were mapped with the organisational practices employed by MHADA. The average value of employee responses was used to prepare a matrix. Data were collected from 148 officers and clerical staff of seven regional boards of MHADA selected on a random basis. The data were analysed using two multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques namely PROMETHEE and TOPSIS. Results obtained by PROMETHEE appear to be more logical. Results indicate e-tender system as the most significant practice influencing the work effectiveness closely followed by process standardisation. The outcome of this study will be helpful for the organisation to develop an appropriate strategy for employees of every board.

Suggested Citation

  • Ajinkya S. Joshi & Vinayak S. Deshpande & Padmakar J. Pawar, 2019. "Evaluating the effect of organisational practices on work effectiveness of employees," International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 133-149.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:12:y:2019:i:2:p:133-149
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=99320
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:12:y:2019:i:2:p:133-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=90 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.