IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcdm/v8y2021i3p211-232.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strengthening preference ranking organisation method for enrichment evaluation with features of paraconsistent Pavelka style fuzzy logic

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulai Inusah
  • Esko Turunen

Abstract

In this study, a new technique of complete ranking is proposed to augment the efficiency of the preference ranking organisation method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) methodology. The technique employs some ideas of the PROMETHEE method and paraconsistent Pavelka style fuzzy logic. To illustrate the effectiveness and efficiency of this novel technique, data on the performance of five mobile phone operators in Ghana is analysed and the results compared with the ranking of the conventional PROMETHEE I and II.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulai Inusah & Esko Turunen, 2021. "Strengthening preference ranking organisation method for enrichment evaluation with features of paraconsistent Pavelka style fuzzy logic," International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(3), pages 211-232.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:8:y:2021:i:3:p:211-232
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=119438
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:8:y:2021:i:3:p:211-232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=350 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.