IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijmcdm/v3y2013i1p1-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A combined analytic hierarchy process and goal programming approach to international portfolio selection in the presence of investment barriers

Author

Listed:
  • Slah Bahloul
  • Fathi Abid

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to develop an integrated multiple criteria decision making approach combining the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the goal programming (GP) model to study the impact of a mixture of investment barriers on international portfolio selection, and therefore the home bias puzzle from the viewpoint of G-7 investors over the period 2001-2009. The AHP is used to determine the suitable international equity portfolios with respect to seven barriers to international investment. The GP model, incorporating the market weights of the maximum return, minimal variance, and AHP portfolios is formulated to determine the optimal international equity portfolios. The main results show that the AHP-GP optimal international portfolio weights are different from those predicted by the I-CAPM. Also, except for French and US investors, home bias values determined according to the AHP-GP portfolios are lower than those calculated on the basis of the value-weighted world market portfolio.

Suggested Citation

  • Slah Bahloul & Fathi Abid, 2013. "A combined analytic hierarchy process and goal programming approach to international portfolio selection in the presence of investment barriers," International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:1-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=52455
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aouni, Belaid & Colapinto, Cinzia & La Torre, Davide, 2014. "Financial portfolio management through the goal programming model: Current state-of-the-art," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(2), pages 536-545.
    2. Cinzia Colapinto & Raja Jayaraman & Simone Marsiglio, 2017. "Multi-criteria decision analysis with goal programming in engineering, management and social sciences: a state-of-the art review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 7-40, April.
    3. Amelia Bilbao-Terol & Mar Arenas-Parra & Verónica Cañal-Fernández & Celia Bilbao-Terol, 2016. "Multi-criteria decision making for choosing socially responsible investment within a behavioral portfolio theory framework: a new way of investing into a crisis environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 247(2), pages 549-580, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:3:y:2013:i:1:p:1-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=350 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.