IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlsma/v40y2021i2p266-286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proposal of a supplier evaluation and ranking method based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS

Author

Listed:
  • Túlio Fígaro Ulhoa
  • Lauro Osiro
  • Rafael Henrique Palma Lima
  • Luiz Cesar Ribeiro Carpinetti

Abstract

As companies increasingly focus on their core competences, the relationship with suppliers becomes more crucial. In complex supply chains, it is vital to continuously evaluate suppliers to aid the purchasing process, thus prioritising suppliers with greater performance. However, the evaluation of suppliers depends on the purchased item and requires the adoption of multiple criteria, which often are qualitative and assessed under uncertainty. This paper contributes to the field of supplier evaluation by proposing a supplier evaluation model that uses qualitative criteria to rank a set of suppliers of a given strategic item. Initially, the model uses fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to weigh the criteria and later it uses fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate suppliers. A real application was carried out in a shoe manufacturer to evaluate leather suppliers, which enabled both the ranking of the current three suppliers and deciding on guidelines on order quantities and supply base development.

Suggested Citation

  • Túlio Fígaro Ulhoa & Lauro Osiro & Rafael Henrique Palma Lima & Luiz Cesar Ribeiro Carpinetti, 2021. "Proposal of a supplier evaluation and ranking method based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 40(2), pages 266-286.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:40:y:2021:i:2:p:266-286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=118739
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlsma:v:40:y:2021:i:2:p:266-286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=134 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.