IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlica/v9y2012i4p380-391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Georgia manufacturing industry: key factors of exchange of knowledge with external sources

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigo Cortes-Lobos

Abstract

Economic studies indicated that highly innovative firms have a decisive influence on national economic growth. Some studies have shown that many industry innovations arise out of research collaboration. Therefore, states seek to implement policies that promote research collaboration leading to highly innovative behaviour among firms within their states. This research study addressed the question: what organisational characteristics of firms are most positively associated with engagement in research collaboration? Drawing data from the 2005 Georgia Manufacturing Survey, this study has compared firms not engaged in research collaboration with those engaged in research collaboration with other firms and/or public research organisations. Using a logic model from econometrics, this research has identified four variables most positively associated with firm's tendency to engage in research collaboration between two firms (size, highly innovative, percentage of workers organised in teams and percentage of workers with training in information technology). The five public-private variables include size, highly innovative and teamwork, process innovation and intra-organisational incentives. Some of these variables are components of a firm's capacity to absorb external knowledge and apply it toward innovation, such us, team work and IT training.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigo Cortes-Lobos, 2012. "Georgia manufacturing industry: key factors of exchange of knowledge with external sources," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 380-391.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:9:y:2012:i:4:p:380-391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=49615
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:9:y:2012:i:4:p:380-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=86 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.