IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlica/v1y2004i1p37-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hoechst challenges received wisdom on organisational learning

Author

Listed:
  • Ariane Berthoin Antal
  • Meinolf Dierkes
  • Camilla Krebsbach-Gnath

Abstract

How does a major international company learn? In particular, how does a successful international company even discover that it needs to learn to do things differently, and to do different things, rather than relying on its past recipes for success? According to the literature, success tends to be a hindrance to learning, while crises tend to stimulate it by calling into question existing ways of seeing and doing things. The analysis of the far-ranging transformation of Hoechst into Aventis in the years 1994 to 2000 challenges and refines some concepts in the literature on organisational learning. The case illustrates how learning was triggered in a successful organisation without waiting for a crisis, how double-loop learning was achieved through mergers and acquisitions, and how unlearning was managed in divestments. The paper modifies theories on the nature of visions and the role of top managers in creating visions, and it breaks some new ground in the exploration of the role of organisational politics in organisational learning processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ariane Berthoin Antal & Meinolf Dierkes & Camilla Krebsbach-Gnath, 2004. "Hoechst challenges received wisdom on organisational learning," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 37-60.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:1:y:2004:i:1:p:37-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=4422
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:1:y:2004:i:1:p:37-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=86 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.