IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlica/v16y2019i1p21-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification and ranking of competency-based recruitment system criteria: an empirical case study

Author

Listed:
  • Abdoulla Karimi
  • Hadi Teimouri
  • Arash Shahin
  • Ali Shaemi Barzoki

Abstract

This study aimed to identify and rank criteria of competency-based recruitment system in an empirical case study. The studied population was experts in human resources management and network administrators of Saderat Bank of Iran as an empirical case study. The study was conducted in two general phases based on qualitative methods (interviews and Delphi) in two stages and quantitative methods for assessing validity and ranking. The results showed that criteria of competency-based recruitment system could be categorised in 5 criteria and 22 sub-criteria. The identified criteria included competence, prospection, integrity, justice and flexibility. Second order factor analysis was used to examine construct validity of the extracted criteria and their questions; Cronbach's alpha was used to check its reliability. The results indicated good validity and factor loading of each component as a criterion of the competency-based recruitment system. Among the identified criteria, competence, prospection, flexibility, integrity and justice, respectively, were more important in the competency-based recruitment system.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdoulla Karimi & Hadi Teimouri & Arash Shahin & Ali Shaemi Barzoki, 2019. "Identification and ranking of competency-based recruitment system criteria: an empirical case study," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1), pages 21-39.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:21-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=96933
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:21-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=86 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.