IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlica/v15y2018i3p219-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Designing a model for identifying key factors of error management culture using grounded theory: an empirical study

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Sheikhaboumasoudi
  • Ali Nasr Isfahani
  • Ali Shaemi Barzoki

Abstract

Error management culture points out that error prevention may be effective in stable environments and with people who are able to predict errors. Error management culture could reduce negative consequences of errors and increase their positive outcomes. Thus, this study tends to design a paradigmatic model for error management culture to better understand the components of this culture. The methodology used is qualitative and based on grounded theory. Findings indicate that the underlying factors, causal factors and intermediary factors are determined at three levels: individual, managerial, and organisational. Detection, acceptance and rapid error control, error knowledge management, error leadership, coordination for error handling, effective error handling, open and transparent communication about errors, and error analysis act as strategies in this process. Outcomes of error management culture are also identified at three levels: individual, managerial, and organisational. EM-based organisational architecture, as a central category, relates these categories through a paradigmatic model.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Sheikhaboumasoudi & Ali Nasr Isfahani & Ali Shaemi Barzoki, 2018. "Designing a model for identifying key factors of error management culture using grounded theory: an empirical study," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(3), pages 219-241.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:15:y:2018:i:3:p:219-241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=94722
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:15:y:2018:i:3:p:219-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=86 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.