IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijlica/v10y2013i3-4p213-227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prioritisation of knowledge management strategies in the learning organisation: an integrated Shannon's entropy-TOPSIS methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Masoud Pourhamidi

Abstract

In an effort to respond to internal and external demands for growth and success, many organisations have adopted the goal of becoming a learning organisation. To be a learning organisation (LO) requires knowledge management (KM), which in turn is dependent of a LO. In this regard, the knowledge management strategy decision-making framework is essential for managers and strategists to determine the most appropriate KM strategy in an efficient manner. Hence, the ranking method called integrated Shannon's entropy-TOPSIS methodology is used to sort the knowledge management by the preference of decision makers. Finally, the case study is illustrated at the Isfahan University's Entrepreneurship Centre. The results indicate that the best knowledge management strategy towards the goal of becoming a learning organisation is the dynamic knowledge management strategy. This means that Entrepreneurship Centre preferred a KM strategy balancing both explicit and tacit knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Masoud Pourhamidi, 2013. "Prioritisation of knowledge management strategies in the learning organisation: an integrated Shannon's entropy-TOPSIS methodology," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3/4), pages 213-227.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:10:y:2013:i:3/4:p:213-227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=57431
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:10:y:2013:i:3/4:p:213-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=86 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.