IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijkbde/v11y2020i1p80-97.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A minimal viable process and tools for massive participation in urban development

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Stelzle
  • Fabrice Naumann
  • Torsten Holmer
  • Anja Jannack
  • Jörg Rainer Noennig

Abstract

The paper aims at providing a framework for enabling massive citizen participation in urban planning projects. Derived from a structured analysis of existing formal and informal citizen participation processes in urban development we developed a comprehensive process supported by a set of digital tools for massive participation. This so-called minimal viable process fulfils: a) good practice standards for participation while b) utilising as few as possible technical means and procedural steps. The newly developed procedure ensures proper citizen involvement from the very start of a project up to design selection. The framework involves all necessary stakeholder groups, who are addressed by specific tools and algorithms. The results of a test run indicate the general applicability of the process and the tools, and provided insight for the further technical development of the IT tools and the procedure itself within the H2020 project "U_CODE Urban Collective Design Environment".

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Stelzle & Fabrice Naumann & Torsten Holmer & Anja Jannack & Jörg Rainer Noennig, 2020. "A minimal viable process and tools for massive participation in urban development," International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 80-97.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijkbde:v:11:y:2020:i:1:p:80-97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=106839
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijkbde:v:11:y:2020:i:1:p:80-97. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=354 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.