IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisen/v8y2011i4p492-519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surrogate modelling and computational experience with the optimisation problem

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed H. Gadallah

Abstract

Surrogate modelling is becoming a necessary modelling tool in engineering analysis and synthesis. This is, especially, true when mathematical models are not available. The capability of response surface methodology is explored with single unconstrained/constrained linear and non-linear problems. Problems with special features or with highly non-linear nature are dealt with. A further development with multi-objective problems starts with bi-objective functions and continues to deal with higher number of objective functions. A simple multi-objective problem is taken to initiate the development. Orthogonal arrays and response surface models are combined and used to explore the sets of Pareto Frontiers. One important result is that various array sizes are able to explore the Pareto set at no or little cost change with comparable accuracy. Except for one array, the optimum solution is typical for all arrays employed. One development is using the first derivative of the two objective functions to obtain the starting point for model construction. Design of experiments and analysis of variance (ANOVA) are employed to verify the relative significance of variables. Results of ANOVA guide the modeller in the model building process. We attempt to achieve a 'local accurate model' rather than a 'global accurate model'. Computational experience with different classes of problems is given.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed H. Gadallah, 2011. "Surrogate modelling and computational experience with the optimisation problem," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(4), pages 492-519.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:8:y:2011:i:4:p:492-519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=41807
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:8:y:2011:i:4:p:492-519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=188 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.