IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijisen/v11y2012i4p375-405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality monitoring and process adjustment by integrating SPC and APC: a review

Author

Listed:
  • Muneeb A. Akram
  • Abdul-Wahid A. Saif
  • M. Abdur Rahim

Abstract

Statistical process control (SPC) and automatic process control (APC) are two important methods that have been used for improving product quality and process productivity. SPC is used for process monitoring, while APC is used for process adjustment. SPC reduces process variability by detecting and eliminating special causes of process variation, while APC reduces variability by adjusting the process to keep the product variability on target. Both the methods were initially thought to be in conflict with each other, but in recent years, many researchers have shown their interest in integrating SPC and APC techniques to reduce total variability of the process. They have found that the techniques used in these two methods are complementary rather than contradictory. A considerable amount of work has appeared in the literature about methods that combine SPC and APC techniques for the same process. In this paper, we will cover preliminaries on SPC and APC and outline the major techniques applied by both. Literature survey related to the issues facing their integration will be outlined. We will also summarise different strategies followed to achieve their integration. Possible future directions of research will be highlighted and our concluding remarks will be indicated.

Suggested Citation

  • Muneeb A. Akram & Abdul-Wahid A. Saif & M. Abdur Rahim, 2012. "Quality monitoring and process adjustment by integrating SPC and APC: a review," International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(4), pages 375-405.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:11:y:2012:i:4:p:375-405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=47543
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boby John & K. K. Chowdhury, 2021. "Minimizing the Dry Content Variation in the Pulp Drying Process Using Six Sigma Methodology," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijisen:v:11:y:2012:i:4:p:375-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=188 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.