IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijiscm/v3y2008i3p246-264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Team learning activities in new product development: a mediating mechanism of transactive memory systems

Author

Listed:
  • Lung-Far Hsieh
  • Shaw K. Chen

Abstract

By combining the research of organisational learning and research in small group information processing, this study aims to explore the relationship between division of labour at the organisation level and new product development (NPD) teams' learning activities. A field study was conducted from two computer and communication components manufacturing companies in Taiwan to apply transactive memory systems (TMS) as the mechanism connecting division of labour with team learning activities. Several propositions derived from this field study are: (1) higher levels of division of labour at organisational level associate with higher levels of TMS perceived by the team members (2) higher levels of responsibility assignment also associate with higher levels of TMS (3) an earlier and clearer TMS associates with more team learning activities. The results of this study are beneficial to the theories of organisational learning and NPD. In addition, because the antecedent variables of this study are malleable to the managers' exertion both in the long-term (division of labour in organisational level) and in the short-term (responsibilities assignment of team members), the outcomes of this study are important to the practice of NPD management.

Suggested Citation

  • Lung-Far Hsieh & Shaw K. Chen, 2008. "Team learning activities in new product development: a mediating mechanism of transactive memory systems," International Journal of Information Systems and Change Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3), pages 246-264.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijiscm:v:3:y:2008:i:3:p:246-264
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=23948
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijiscm:v:3:y:2008:i:3:p:246-264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=79 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.