IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijilea/v3y2006i1p45-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Faculty perceptions of communications channels: a survey

Author

Listed:
  • Rolando Pena-Sanchez
  • Richard C. Hicks

Abstract

Individual communication between faculty and students outside of the classroom is one of the cornerstones of education. This survey examines the perceptions of the faculty of three communications media for several communication tasks that occur between students and faculty. The faculty at a small Texas state university was invited to participate in a survey that elicited their perceptions on the effectiveness of telephone, face to face, and e-mail communication. In this survey, the relevant results are that faculty expressed a preference for e-mail for convenience, retention, and efficiency. Office hours were preferred for confrontation, confidentiality, and emotional support. Equal preference for e-mail and office hours were expressed for accuracy, receiving work, reaching a consensus, and overall effectiveness. The same preference for the three communication channels (office hours, e-mail, and phone) was expressed for the timeliness criterion. These preferences are then evaluated to determine managerial implications for innovation and learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Rolando Pena-Sanchez & Richard C. Hicks, 2006. "Faculty perceptions of communications channels: a survey," International Journal of Innovation and Learning, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 45-62.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:3:y:2006:i:1:p:45-62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=8179
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bahar Rajabi & Mahmood Hashemian, 2015. "A Comparative Study of the Effectiveness of Two Methods of Teaching Resumptive Pronouns in Writing: TBLT and Blended Learning," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(9), pages 196-196, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijilea:v:3:y:2006:i:1:p:45-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=57 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.