IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijidsc/v15y2023i3p280-301.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and selection of a casting process using interval type-2 fuzzy analytical hierarchy process

Author

Listed:
  • Devesh Sahu
  • Atul Chakrawarti

Abstract

Selection of a casting process is a kind of multi-criteria decision-making process, in which several factors like cost, material utilisation and flexibility, geometrical complexity and flexibility and dimensional accuracy and surface finish. As cost is considered one of the prime criteria in decision making, it is further sub-categorised into three sub-criteria, i.e., tooling cost, equipment cost, and labour cost. Past researchers have used multi-criteria decision-making technique like analytical hierarchy process along with type-1 fuzzy in the evaluation and selection of casting process, which is successful in handling the fuzziness of the system but are unable to address the issue of uncertainty associated with decision making. So, in this paper interval type-2 fuzzy analytical hierarchy process is used to evaluate and select best casting process among sand casting, gravity die casting, shell moulding, plaster mould casting, pressure die casting and investment casting, and capable of handling uncertainty associated with decision making. A numerical illustration is solved using the interval type-2 fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and it is found that investment casting is evaluated as best casting process for cam carrier and is ranked number one.

Suggested Citation

  • Devesh Sahu & Atul Chakrawarti, 2023. "Evaluation and selection of a casting process using interval type-2 fuzzy analytical hierarchy process," International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(3), pages 280-301.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:280-301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=132824
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijidsc:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:280-301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=306 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.