IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijicbm/v9y2014i2p181-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional effectiveness in higher education: a comparative analysis of students' perceived responses in Indian context

Author

Listed:
  • Koustab Ghosh

Abstract

The demand for postgraduate business management education has witnessed a sharp increase since the last two decades worldwide. Taking this opportunity and for fulfilling the gap between the demand and supply many private players have also made their foray into this education segment. This paper has made an attempt to explore the fundamental issue of the institutional effectiveness factors of such institutions by analysing structured responses from the group of students. The responses from the students of two postgraduate business management educational institutions located in India were obtained, descriptive and gap analysis were done, and finally Kano technique was applied to categorise and prioritise the effectiveness dimensions. The empirical findings from the study established that majority of the effectiveness factors for institution A emerged as 'attractive', whereas for institution B it came out as 'must be' category. The results of the study would help the planners of the higher education to focus and improve on the factors for ensuring the long-run effectiveness of such institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Koustab Ghosh, 2014. "Institutional effectiveness in higher education: a comparative analysis of students' perceived responses in Indian context," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 181-204.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:9:y:2014:i:2:p:181-204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=64188
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijicbm:v:9:y:2014:i:2:p:181-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=235 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.