IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijhrdm/v22y2022i1-2p19-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work-leisure conflict and facilitation: a study based on the JD-R model

Author

Listed:
  • Shih-Hao Liu
  • Jehn-Yih Wong
  • Tzu-Ching Lai
  • Chien-Chu Wang

Abstract

It is important to understand the interactions between an individual's work and leisure life domains. This study aimed to examine the relationship between work and leisure interaction (including work-to-leisure conflict, leisure-to-work conflict, work-to-leisure facilitation, and leisure-to-work facilitation) and the job demand-resource model. A quantitative research design was also conducted. A questionnaire was used for data collection. A total of 473 valid responses were retained, and the effective response rate was 86%. Structured equation modelling was used for data analysis and hypothesis testing. The results indicate that job demand is positively related to work-to leisure conflict and negatively related to work-to-leisure facilitation, and job resources are positively related to work-to-leisure facilitation and leisure-to work facilitation but negatively related to work-to-leisure conflict and leisure to-work conflict. Based on the findings, suggestions were provided to human resource managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Shih-Hao Liu & Jehn-Yih Wong & Tzu-Ching Lai & Chien-Chu Wang, 2022. "Work-leisure conflict and facilitation: a study based on the JD-R model," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(1/2), pages 19-38.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:22:y:2022:i:1/2:p:19-38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=121318
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:22:y:2022:i:1/2:p:19-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=15 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.