IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijhrdm/v20y2020i2p140-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Employee relationship and its effect on organisational commitment: a critical look at a Japanese subsidiary of India

Author

Listed:
  • Kaushik Chaudhuri

Abstract

This article investigates whether the implementation of the management practices on the shop floor of Japanese organisations located overseas in developing economies has affected the employees' organisational commitment. A qualitative study involving in-depth interviews from twenty general employees across different sections of a leading Japanese auto-maker's plant located near the national capital region (NCR) of India, have revealed a depleting relationship and dwindling commitment with their management owing to over intensified work pressure, strain, and stress. The author has proposed four profiles of employee commitments by explaining the phenomenon of employment relationship and employee behaviour through a matrix model coined as 'BION' – balanced, idealists, opportunists and non-committals. The study yielded a majority of respondents, nine employees associating with the profile of the opportunists, followed by seven respondents with the profile of the balanced and only four employees were identified with the idealists. Theoretical and practical implications with limitations of the findings have been discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaushik Chaudhuri, 2020. "Employee relationship and its effect on organisational commitment: a critical look at a Japanese subsidiary of India," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(2), pages 140-165.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:20:y:2020:i:2:p:140-165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=106252
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:20:y:2020:i:2:p:140-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=15 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.