IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijhrdm/v17y2017i1-2p162-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Betrayal of local government whistleblowers: expecting rights and resources, facing harsh realities

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca L. Stafford

Abstract

This is an in-depth and innovative study that examines the experiences of public leader whistleblowers of county government agencies who were targets of employer retaliation. When circumstances are such that a person confronts corruption in an organisation, they can be exposed to biological, psychological, and sociological factors that contribute to intensified and prolonged psychological trauma. In politicised government agencies, whistleblowers are vulnerable to retaliatory action that results in job loss with subsequent financial devastation (Alford, 2001), exacerbated by a lack of legitimate resources (Stafford, 2015). A convenience sample of 11 public leader whistle blowers' narratives of their traumatic experiences and their efforts to cope, revealed betrayal by organisational procedures that workers expected would protect them. This duplicity was compounded by a paucity of resources outside their offending organisations, necessary to help them restore their lives.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca L. Stafford, 2017. "Betrayal of local government whistleblowers: expecting rights and resources, facing harsh realities," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(1/2), pages 162-181.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:17:y:2017:i:1/2:p:162-181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=85272
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:17:y:2017:i:1/2:p:162-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=15 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.