IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijhdev/v6y2021i3p237-262.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applying optimisation programming and research generator methods to measure subjective well-being within country

Author

Listed:
  • Reza Nadimi
  • Shiori Tanaka
  • Koji Tokimatsu

Abstract

Survey data collected from eight countries (Japan, Switzerland, Singapore, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Bhutan, and Indonesia) are used to extract social resources through optimisation programming technique as well as resource generator method. These resources are used to propose an aggregated subjective well-being (SWB) indicator in each country. Relationship between this indicator and gross domestic product (GDP) per capita is also examined to consider economy impact on SWB. The results indicate that a high GDP per capita is a necessary factor to improve well-being, but non-economic pillar is also essential. Non-economic domains of SWB are more influential in Bhutan, and Indonesia (developing countries). In contrast, the results show a positive relation between the economic domain and SWB in the rest of countries (developed countries). The "Safety and Relief", "Life Satisfaction", and "Expertise and skills" factors are significant domains for SWB in developed countries. While, "Health and welfare", "safety and Relief", and "Economic Stability" are influential factors in Bhutan, and Indonesia.

Suggested Citation

  • Reza Nadimi & Shiori Tanaka & Koji Tokimatsu, 2021. "Applying optimisation programming and research generator methods to measure subjective well-being within country," International Journal of Happiness and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(3), pages 237-262.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijhdev:v:6:y:2021:i:3:p:237-262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=117098
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijhdev:v:6:y:2021:i:3:p:237-262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=395 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.