IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijhdev/v3y2016i2p162-174.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wellbeing differences between students in China, Thailand and the USA

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Monk-Turner
  • Charlie Turner
  • Ma Jiliang

Abstract

In this exploratory study, subjective wellbeing (SWB) differences between college students in China, Thailand and the USA are examined. Utilising a convenience sample of 314 students, data show that significant predictors of wellbeing for all students are enjoying good mental health, regularly seeing family and friends, reporting good physical health, feeling positively about having enough resources for future needs, and feeling positively about their past year of college. For Chinese students, SWB is positively associated with regularly seeing family and friends and reporting their past year of college was a good one. Like Chinese students, US students enjoy greater SWB if they regularly see family and friends. SWB among the US sample is also positively shaped by having enough resources to meet future needs and reporting good mental health. Finally, Thai students who report good physical health and who ranked their income as very good in the past year experience greater SWB than others, all else equal.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Monk-Turner & Charlie Turner & Ma Jiliang, 2016. "Wellbeing differences between students in China, Thailand and the USA," International Journal of Happiness and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2), pages 162-174.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijhdev:v:3:y:2016:i:2:p:162-174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=79597
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijhdev:v:3:y:2016:i:2:p:162-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=395 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.