IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijeven/v14y2022i1p16-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Entrepreneurial decision-making logics during time-critical pivoting: empirical evidence from high-tech ventures

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Pöschl

Abstract

Entrepreneurs typically adopt decision-making logics such as effectuation, causation or a hybrid during venture creation and development. One part of such development involves the search for viable business models. Ventures might need to deviate from their initial plan and radically change (i.e., pivot). While entrepreneurial decision-making logics at venture creation have received substantial research attention, we know little about their dynamics during pivoting. Specifically, pivoting is often accompanied by time and resource constraints for entrepreneurs and such constraints can influence entrepreneurial decision-making. This inductive and multiple case study is based on 14 ventures in Europe's DACH region. It explores the question of how and why time constraints and perceived time pressures affect entrepreneurs' decision-making logics during pivoting processes. Findings suggest that entrepreneurs tend to employ more effectual logics when time constraints and perceived time pressures are pronounced and vice versa for causal logics. The emerging findings contribute to entrepreneurship and effectuation theory in that they indicate that time plays a crucial role for pivoting entrepreneurs' decision-making logics.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Pöschl, 2022. "Entrepreneurial decision-making logics during time-critical pivoting: empirical evidence from high-tech ventures," International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(1), pages 16-52.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijeven:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:16-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=122016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijeven:v:14:y:2022:i:1:p:16-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=123 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.