IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijetma/v22y2019i2-3p207-219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the effects of elevated concentrations of urea, phosphogypsum and paper mill sludge on soil chemical, microbial and exoenzyme dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Suryasikha Samal
  • C.S.K. Mishra
  • Sunanda Sahoo

Abstract

Urea, phosphogypsum (PG) and paper mill sludge (PMS) are commonly used to address soil nutrient deficiency. In this study, these chemicals were used at recommended agricultural dose (RAD) along with low and high concentrations to assess their effects on soil chemical and biological quality. Urea was applied at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 g/kg soil, PG at 50, 100, 150 g/kg soil and PMS at 5, 10, 15 g/kg soil. Significant variation in soil pH, electrical conductivity and organic carbon (OC) were noticed in response to chemical concentration and treatment types. The percent OC reduction was high in PG and PMS treated soils. Percent nitrogen and phosphorous in soil increased with the concentrations of urea and PG. Invariably, lower bacterial and fungal population were observed in treated soils relative to control. Activities of amylase, cellulase, invertase, dehydrogenase and protease were inhibited at high concentration of all test chemicals with minor deviations. The study indicated that bacterial population and exoenzymes could be useful markers to evaluate soil toxicity due to hyper concentrations of urea, PG and PMS in soil.

Suggested Citation

  • Suryasikha Samal & C.S.K. Mishra & Sunanda Sahoo, 2019. "Evaluating the effects of elevated concentrations of urea, phosphogypsum and paper mill sludge on soil chemical, microbial and exoenzyme dynamics," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(2/3), pages 207-219.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:22:y:2019:i:2/3:p:207-219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=102205
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:22:y:2019:i:2/3:p:207-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=11 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.