IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijesbu/v39y2020i3p363-382.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Internal corporate governance mechanisms and intellectual capital disclosure: evidence from Tunisia

Author

Listed:
  • Mondher Kouki
  • Mariem Bouchareb
  • Abderrazek El Khaldi

Abstract

This paper examines the effect of internal corporate governance mechanisms on intellectual capital disclosure. Using data of 27 non-financial listed Tunisian firms, the current study provides evidence in support of the nonlinear relationship between corporate governance and Intellectual capital disclosure. The empirical results show that the structure and the way the board of directors' functions are systematically significant factors determining intangible capital disclosure. The empirical tests indicate that managers, majority shareholders as well as institutional shareholders have a significant effect on the informative transparency of intangible capital. These results seem to corroborate the view that an increase in corporate governance mechanisms has a positive effect on voluntary disclosure. Furthermore, tests of the nonlinear hypothesis show that an increase in the number of board members up to nine, and an increase in the number of majority shareholders up to 67% have a beneficial effect on intangible disclosure. However, as these variables increase beyond a turning point, the effect inverts and cuts off the improvement of voluntary disclosure of intangibles.

Suggested Citation

  • Mondher Kouki & Mariem Bouchareb & Abderrazek El Khaldi, 2020. "Internal corporate governance mechanisms and intellectual capital disclosure: evidence from Tunisia," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 39(3), pages 363-382.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:39:y:2020:i:3:p:363-382
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=104995
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:39:y:2020:i:3:p:363-382. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=74 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.