IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijesbu/v19y2013i3p293-308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The efficient market hypothesis: the applicability of quantitative methods to foreign stocks traded as American depository receipts (ADRs)

Author

Listed:
  • Darrol J. Stanley
  • Michael D. Kinsman
  • Bruce A. Samuelson

Abstract

The efficient market hypothesis assumes each security's price remains at continuous parity with its investment value. This presumption elicits challenge. The efficient market hypothesis denies that mechanical trading rules from either price or fundamental data are investment strategies capable of outperforming market averages on a risk-adjusted basis after transaction costs. US academic literature is now presenting contrary evidence. Vigorous investigations into alleged validity of the efficient market hypothesis challenge scholarly investigators to uncover pockets of inefficiency in their attempts to disprove market efficiency. This study cited two noted anomalies from the US markets. The two analyses were applied to the American depository receipt stock market to determine whether these anomalies likewise exist. This study investigates the weak-form through a price momentum reversal and volume strategy. Further, it investigated a semi-strong form EMH through a mechanical trading strategy of price momentum reversal and value and earnings momentum. The study period was for ten years ending December 31, 2011 incorporating monthly rebalancing equally-weighted. Results were formulated on a total return basis and expressed on a geometric basis. The top monthly weak-form portfolio supported the efficiency of the market. The top monthly semi-strong portfolio indicated a pocket of exploitable inefficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Darrol J. Stanley & Michael D. Kinsman & Bruce A. Samuelson, 2013. "The efficient market hypothesis: the applicability of quantitative methods to foreign stocks traded as American depository receipts (ADRs)," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(3), pages 293-308.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:19:y:2013:i:3:p:293-308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=55304
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijesbu:v:19:y:2013:i:3:p:293-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=74 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.