IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijepee/v15y2022i1p28-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brexit aftermath - a lot of fuss over nothing? The perspective of the EU-27 member states

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Mroczek-Dąbrowska
  • Anna Matysek-Jędrych

Abstract

The uncertainty of the post-Brexit relations between the UK and the remaining EU-27 countries has caused political and economic concerns (Kroll and Leuffen, 2016). The ongoing negotiations concerning future relations cover various scenarios that may have different impacts on the individual economies in both an economic and a political sense. The article analyses consequences of the British voters' decision to withdraw from the European Union through the lens of a disintegration process and its main objective is to identify the scale and the nature of individual countries vulnerability toward Brexit. It demonstrates purely economic approach to the critical assessment of Brexit, with focus on building rankings of losers. In this way, we contribute to the ongoing debate on the Brexit negotiation process by providing strong arguments in favour of certain policy decisions. In line with the 'neighbour country hypothesis' and 'small country hypothesis', we assume that small economies will experience moderate to high negative consequences of Brexit, while larger ones will not be affected as much, having regard, however, to the country's location in relation to the UK.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Mroczek-Dąbrowska & Anna Matysek-Jędrych, 2022. "Brexit aftermath - a lot of fuss over nothing? The perspective of the EU-27 member states," International Journal of Economic Policy in Emerging Economies, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(1), pages 28-45.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijepee:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:28-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=120060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijepee:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:28-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=219 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.